With regards to the new rule that it is the players responsibility when trading pets, how have you reached this decision?
We are buying a pet that is in a transport box, taking the others players word of what is or isn't on the said pet. If the seller chooses to lie about the books that are on the pet, its a blatant scam. No-one "chooses" to be scammed. There either needs to be a better transport box that allows people to see the books/days on the pet. Or GMs need to be more available to over see the trade.
Passing the responsibility from yourselves to the players is encouraging people to scam.
- sLT, Hype, Maniac and 1 other like this